Investors are buying shares on these markets with little to no knowledge of the actual financial results of the underlying companies. There are no disclosure requirements because these markets take advantage of employees or early shareholders who want to unload their shares to the highest bidder. Investors see these markets as a chance to get in on hot, pre-IPO, Internet startups.
Facebook shares are the ones most in demand on these markets. They recently traded at an implied valuation of above $50 billion on SecondMarket, and $42.4 billion on SharesPost. A couple years ago, Facebook won an exemption from the SEC’s 500-shareholder rule by arguing that the shares were mostly held by employees, and it also changed the way it issued restricted stock. But if the number of external shareholders exceeds 500 investors, the SEC might want to revisit that exemption. The same issue would hold for other private companies who end up with more than 500 shareholders through these private sales.
The SEC is obviously concerned about the growth of these unregulated markets. To the extent that they become an alternative to public markets, the SEC may require the same sorts of disclosures for companies which gain more than 500 shareholders as a result of their shares being traded there. At that point the companies may as well go public because they gain nothing from these secondary markets other than as a release valve for employees and early investors. (Companies typically do not sell their own shares through these markets, nor do they benefit financially from the trading). In the end, it is all about disclosure. Because nobody can really know what these companies are worth without knowing their true profits, losses, revenue growth, and other financial metrics. If it looks like a public company and trades like a public company then the SEC might just end up regulating it like a public company.
Photo credit: Flickr/andrecismo
7 7
Authors: Erick Schonfeld