Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act,” (.pdf) amounts to the Holy Grail of intellectual-property enforcement. The recording industry and movie studies have been clamoring for such a capability since the George W. Bush Administration. If passed, the Justice Department could ask a federal court to for an injunction that would order a domain registrar or registry to stop resolving a infringing site’s domain name, so that visitors to PirateBay.org, for example, would get a 404 error.

“In today’s global economy the internet has become the glue of international commerce –- connecting consumers with a wide-array of products and services worldwide,” said Senator Orin Hatch (R-Utah) in a statement announcing the bill. “But it’s also become a tool for online thieves to sell counterfeit and pirated goods, making hundreds of millions of dollars off of stolen American intellectual property.”

The bill would direct injunctions at a piracy site’s domain registrar, if the registration was through a U.S. company. If not, the Justice Department could serve the court order at the registry for the site’s top-level domain. Registry’s for the dot-com, dot-net and dot-org domains are all U.S.-based, and thus within the courts’ jurisdiction.

If history is a guide, though, the bill is destined to fail in Congress.

The Bush administration in 2008 threatened to veto the legislation that created the nation’s first copyright czar until similar Justice Department powers were removed. At the time, the White House complained that directing the attorney general to sue copyright infringers “could result in Department of Justice prosecutors serving as pro bono lawyers for private copyright holders regardless of their resources. In effect, taxpayer-supported department lawyers would pursue lawsuits for copyright holders, with monetary recovery going to industry.”

Things may be different under President Barack Obama. The president has tapped five former Recording Industry Association of America lawyers to key Justice Department positions.

Bob Pisano, the Motion Picture Association of America chief executive, applauded the measure’s introduction.

“These sites, whose content is hosted and whose operators are located throughout the world, take many forms. But they have in common the simple fact that they all materially contribute to, facilitate and/or induce the illegal distribution of copyrighted works, such as movies and television programs,” Pisano said.

David Israelite, chief executive of the National Music Publishers’ Association, also welcomed the proposal. “There is simply no excuse for internet sites that profit illegally from the works of others to be allowed to function unchallenged,” he said in a statement.

Websites eligible for Justice Department targeting — if the measure is approved — must be “dedicated to infringing activities,” according to the text’s language. A site can be “subject to civil forfeiture” if it’s “primarily designed” as a pirate site with “no demonstrable, commercially significant purpose or use” other than to distribute pirated or counterfeited wares.

The measure’s other sponsors include Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), and committee members Herb Kohl (D-Wisconsin), Arlen Specter (D-Pennsylvania), Chuck Schumer (D-New York), Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota). Senators Evan Bayh (D-Indiana) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio) are also co-sponsors.

Last updated: 16:45 EDT

Photo: Richard Winchell/Flickr

Authors: David Kravets

to know more click here